Laudato Sisustainable sport · methods & practiceRU
Connected to:Event ResourcesWaste criterionScore an event
Waste · Operations

Sports venue waste: track where every stream actually goes

A destination-based method for reuse, recycling, organics, energy recovery and landfill that avoids hiding different outcomes in one diversion rate.

Basketball area with discarded plastic waste
MetricWaste destination mix
Unitkg and % by destination
BaselinePrevious event series with the same destination definitions.
LimitationDiversion rate can overstate circularity when energy recovery is grouped with recycling.

Destination mass before diversion rate

One diversion percentage can hide very different systems. Keep kilograms and percentages for reuse, recycling, organics treatment, energy recovery and landfill as separate rows. Reconcile contractor tickets to event dates and flag estimated containers. EPA’s Waste Reduction Model is useful for scenario comparisons of treatment routes, but modeled emissions should not be confused with measured venue waste mass.

Follow each stream beyond the loading dock

Record the measured mass and final destination for reuse, recycling, organics, energy recovery and landfill separately. Contractor invoices and transfer notes should reconcile with the event log. If a destination is estimated rather than weighed, mark it as such instead of allowing the percentage to look equally certain.

Diversion is a summary, not the ledger

A single diversion rate can be useful for communication, but it can hide a move from recycling to energy recovery or a change in contamination. Keep the underlying masses so the venue can see which stream improved and which treatment route merely changed labels.

Follow the material after it leaves the concourse

A high diversion percentage is only meaningful when the final destinations are known. Mixed material may be sorted, composted, recycled, digested or sent to energy recovery, and those routes should not be treated as interchangeable.

A destination ledger creates a simple chain of evidence from hauler ticket to event report. It also makes contamination visible: if a stream repeatedly fails quality checks, the venue can adjust bin placement, back-of-house sorting or supplier packaging at the next event.

At event close, compare internal container or compactor records with contractor weights and destination tickets. The objective is not to create perfect precision for every bag, but to make the major streams reconcile: reuse, recycling, organics, energy recovery and landfill. If estimates are needed, record the sampling method and keep estimated mass distinguishable from weighed mass.

Contamination should be visible because it explains why a stream changes destination. A recycling container that is repeatedly rejected is not delivering the same outcome as clean material accepted by the processor. Operations teams can use contamination notes to adjust signage, bin placement, steward instructions or back-of-house sorting rather than only watching the final diversion percentage.

For reporting, publish both the absolute mass and the share by destination. The absolute figure prevents a smaller event from looking automatically better, while the percentage shows how treatment routes changed. Together they tell a much fuller story than diversion alone.

Reconcile contractor tickets by final destination and mass, then keep reuse, recycling, organics, energy recovery and landfill as separate lines. A diversion percentage without that ledger cannot show what actually happened to the material.

Show the destination categories and absolute mass behind the percentage. If energy recovery is included, name it rather than merging it into recycling. If part of the mass is estimated, mark it. These details make the result longer but stop a favorable headline from hiding a worse material route. The ledger should remain the primary record; diversion is only its summary.

The bin colour is not the destination

A front-of-house recycling stream can still be rejected, resorted or sent to energy recovery after collection. Ask contractors for weights by final treatment route and reconcile those records with site collections. If a destination is unknown, keep it unknown rather than assigning the most optimistic outcome.

This ledger is particularly useful for reusable cup systems and food waste, because both can look successful at the concourse while downstream losses remain hidden.

Reconcile waste like a material account

For each stream, keep collection date, mass, haulier, receiving facility and treatment. Where a contractor reports a percentage rather than a measured weight, record the estimation method. The result is a trail that procurement and auditors can challenge.

Temporary event materials need a parallel route. Assets intended for continued use belong in a material passport; once something becomes waste, it should enter the destination ledger with the same discipline as bottles, food or cardboard.

Diversion rate can remain a headline, but it should be calculated from this destination-level evidence. That prevents the percentage from becoming a marketing number disconnected from where material actually went.

Sources and notes